Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Venezuela pulls gold reserves in West

http://previous.presstv.ir/photo/20111128/yasaman.hashemi20111128082005687.jpg
Soldiers stand guard as an armored truck containing gold reserves arrives to the Central Bank in Caracas, Venezuela, Friday Nov. 25, 2011.
Venezuela has begun to repatriate the South American nation's gold treasures held in Western banks in a move to protect the country against economic crises in the United States and Europe, a report says.


The shipment of gold arrived in Venezuela on Friday after President Hugo Chavez ordered the repossession of 85 percent of the country's bullion reserves from overseas banks, Al Jazeera news network reported on Saturday.

The gold was unloaded from a plane and transported under heavy security to the Central Bank in the capital, Caracas.

President Chavez has described the move as an act of sovereignty that will protect Venezuela's reserves from global economic turbulence.

"It's coming to the place it never should have left. ... The vaults of the central bank of Venezuela, not the bank of London or the bank of the United States. It's our gold," Chavez said on national television.

Nelson Merentes, Venezuela's Central Bank president said the return of the gold to Venezuela was a "historic act."

Merentes said the gold had come from the UK but did not say what portion was in the initial shipment.

The gold had been held abroad since the late 1980s to secure loans requested from the International Monetary Fund by prior governments, he said.

The move is considered as the start of a process that will eventually see up to 160 tons of gold, worth more than $11billion, brought home.

Most of Venezuela's foreign gold reserves are held in London.

New year could usher in higher taxes, about $934 for average family

Nearly 2.1 million Louisiana residents who benefited from Social Security tax reductions in 2011 will resume paying at the old rates on Jan. 1 unless Congress and the Obama administration reach a deal to continue the cuts for another year. Although there's bipartisan support for continuing with the lower Social Security tax rates, worth $934 to the average family, disagreements on how to offset the $110 billion cost makes enactment uncertain -- not surprising given even routine legislation is stalled by Washington's highly partisan divide.
us_capitol_bare_tree_branches.jpgView full sizeThe U.S. Capitol was photographed Nov. 19.
Senate Democrats, backed by President Barack Obama, will offer up legislation this week that would continue the tax breaks for another year, paying for it with a 3.25 percent tax surcharge on incomes of $1 million or higher. GOP opposition is likely to kill the proposal.
To Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., the proposal provides badly needed relief for the vast majority of Louisianans, while raising taxes slightly on less than one-half of 1 percent of state residents.
"The wealth gap continues to increase as the middle class gets squeezed," Landrieu said. "This plan is about bringing fairness to the tax code -- it is a commonsense step that will provide relief to middle-class families and help employers create jobs and put this recession in the rearview mirror."
Sen. David Vitter, R-La., wants the payroll tax extended, along with extended unemployment insurance benefits for those who exhausted the normal 26 weeks of coverage, but only if costs are offset with cuts in other federal spending. He is joining in the Republican argument that higher taxes on the wealthy would affect not just the super-rich, but many small-business owners who could end up hiring fewer Americans.
"As we try to get out of this horrible Obama economy, I think we should work hard to avoid raising any taxes -- on workers, on small businesses, and on investors who help grow businesses," Vitter said. "And I certainly think many unemployed folks need continuing help."
Not all Republicans are committed to continuing the payroll tax breaks.
Rep. Jeff Landry, R-New Iberia, while not closing the door on continuing the payroll tax breaks, said he worries about cutting revenue for Social Security, given "the program is going broke."
Rep. Steve Scalise, R-Jefferson, said he'll continue to push for "closing loopholes and lowering overall rates" to make American small businesses more competitive. "Additionally, rather than continuing to extend unemployment benefits, we should instead focus on creating jobs," Scalise said.
Rep. Cedric Richmond, D-New Orleans, said it would be wrong to eliminate the payroll tax reductions, as well as extended unemployment benefits, when so many Americans continue to face serious economic challenges.
"While some progress has been made regarding our economy, the fact of the matter is that everyday folks and American businesses are still struggling with the effects of one of the worst economic periods this country has faced since the Great Depression," Richmond said. "Payroll tax relief and unemployment benefits have played a critical role during our recovery, and their importance has not diminished."
About 15,000 Louisiana residents face loss of unemployment benefits if Congress doesn't continue extended benefits, according to Richmond's office.
The payroll tax holiday, enacted in December 2010, part of a compromise bill that also extended the so-called Bush tax cuts through the end of 2012, reduced employees' share of the Social Security levy from 6.2 percent of earnings -- up to $106,800 -- to 4.2 percent. The bill also reduced the Social Security tax that self-employed Americans pay from 12.4 percent of taxable earnings to 10.4 percent.
Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics, predicted that if Congress fails to extend the temporary payroll tax cut and extended unemployment benefits, it could mean about 1 million fewer jobs for the economy by the end of 2012.
Rep. Charles Boustany, R-Lafayette, who is willing to continue the payroll tax reduction and extended unemployment benefits if offsetting spending cuts are enacted, said much more needs to be done.
"Our nation needs fundamental tax reform aimed not only at reducing tax rates, but also at simplifying the current tax system in order to restore American competitiveness," said Boustany, who sits on the House tax writing committee.
Bruce Alpert can be reached at balpert@timespicayune.com or 202.450.1406.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Occupy Student Debt: Students Urged to Refuse to Pay Off Loans as Schools Hike Tuition | Truthout

Occupy Student Debt: Students Urged to Refuse to Pay Off Loans as Schools Hike Tuition | Truthout

Patriot Millionaires: Let the Bush Tax Cuts Expire Once and for All | Truthout

Patriot Millionaires: Let the Bush Tax Cuts Expire Once and for All | Truthout

As Public Sector Sheds Jobs, Blacks Are Hit Hardest

Don Buckley lost his job driving a Chicago Transit Authority bus almost two years ago and has been looking for work ever since, even as other municipal bus drivers around the country are being laid off.

Readers’ Comments

At 34, Mr. Buckley, his two daughters and his fiancĂ©e have moved into the basement of his mother’s house. He has had to delay his marriage, and his entire savings, $27,000, is gone. “I was the kind of person who put away for a rainy day,” he said recently. “It’s flooding now.”
Mr. Buckley is one of tens of thousands of once solidly middle-class African-American government workers — bus drivers in Chicago, police officers and firefighters in Cleveland, nurses and doctors in Florida — who have been laid off since therecession ended in June 2009. Such job losses have blunted gains made in employment and wealth during the previous decade and undermined the stability of neighborhoods where there are now fewer black professionals who own homes or who get up every morning to go to work.
Though the recession and continuing economic downturn have been devastating to the American middle class as a whole, the two and a half years since the declared end of the recession have been singularly harmful to middle-class blacks in terms of layoffs and unemployment, according to economists and recent government data. About one in five black workers have public-sector jobs, and African-American workers are one-third more likely than white ones to be employed in the public sector.
“The reliance on these jobs has provided African-Americans a path upward,” said Robert H. Zieger, emeritus professor of history at the University of Florida, and the author of a book on race and labor. “But it is also a vulnerability.”
study by the Center for Labor Research and Education at the University of California this spring concluded, “Any analysis of the impact to society of additional layoffs in the public sector as a strategy to address the fiscal crisis should take into account the disproportionate impact the reductions in government employment have on the black community.”
Jobless rates among blacks have consistently been about double those of whites. In October, the black unemployment rate was 15.1 percent, compared with 8 percent for whites. Last summer, the black unemployment rate hit 16.7 percent, its highest level since 1984.
Economists say there are probably a variety of reasons for the racial gap, including generally lower educational levels for African-Americans, continuing discrimination and the fact that many live in areas that have been slow to recover economically.
Though the precise number of African-Americans who have lost public-sector jobs nationally since 2009 is unclear, observers say the current situation in Chicago is typical. There, nearly two-thirds of 212 city employees facing layoffs are black, according to theAmerican Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Union.
The central role played by government employment in black communities is hard to overstate. African-Americans in the public sector earn 25 percent more than other black workers, and the jobs have long been regarded as respectable, stable work for college graduates, allowing many to buy homes, send children to private colleges and achieve other markers of middle-class life that were otherwise closed to them.
Blacks have relied on government jobs in large numbers since at least Reconstruction, when the United States Postal Service hired freed slaves. The relationship continued through a century during which racial discrimination barred blacks from many private-sector jobs, and carried over into the 1960s when government was vastly expanded to provide more services, like bus lines to new suburbs, additional public hospitals and schools, and more.
But during the past year, while the private sector has added 1.6 million jobs, state and local governments have shed at least 142,000 positions, according to the Labor Department. Those losses are in addition to 200,000 public-sector jobs lost in 2010 and more than 500,000 since the start of the recession.
The layoffs are only the latest piece of bad news for the nation’s struggling black middle class.
A study by the Brookings Institution in 2007 found that fewer than one-third of blacks born to middle-class parents went on to earn incomes greater than their parents, compared with more than two-thirds of whites from the same income bracket. The foreclosure crisis also wiped out a large part of a generation of black homeowners.
The layoffs are not expected to end any time soon. The United States Postal Service, where about 25 percent of employees are black, is considering eliminating 220,000 positions in order to stay solvent, and areas with large black populations — from urban Detroit to rural Jefferson County, Miss. — are struggling with budget problems that could also lead to mass layoffs.
The postal cuts alone — which would amount to more than one-third of the work force — would be a blow both economically and psychologically, employees say.
Pamela Sparks, 49, a 25-year Postal Service veteran in Baltimore, has a brother who is a letter carrier and a sister who is a sales associate at the Postal Service. Her father is a retired station manager.
“With our whole family working for the Post Office, it would be hard to help each other out because we’d all be out of work,” Ms. Sparks said. “It has afforded us a lot of things we needed to survive really, but this is one of the drawbacks.”
In Michigan, Valerie Kindle, 61, who was laid off in April as a state government employee, said the loss of her $50,000-a-year job with benefits had caused her to put off retirement. Instead, she is looking for work. Two relatives have also lost state government jobs recently.
“There hasn’t been one family member who hasn’t been touched by a layoff,” Ms. Kindle said. “We are losing the bulk of our middle class. I was much better off than my parents, and I’m feeling my children will not be as well off as I was. There’s not as much government work and not as many manufacturing jobs. It’s just going down so wrong for us. When I think about it I get frightened, so I try not to think about it.”
Mr. Buckley, the unemployed Chicago bus driver who now lives in his mother’s basement, said his mother, a Postal Service employee, had grown tired of him “eating up all her food.”
“She’s ready for me to get up out of here,” he said. In the meantime, Mr. Buckley says his life has drifted into the tedium of looking for decent-paying jobs that do not exist.
“I was living the American dream — my version of the American dream,” he said of his $23.76-an-hour job. “Then it crumbled. They get you used to having things and then they take them away, and you realize how lucky you were.”

IRS Files Tax Lien against Rapper Bow Wow: for Unpaid Taxes Accounting Today

IRS Files Tax Lien against Rapper Bow Wow: for Unpaid Taxes Accounting Today

Tax tips for the wealthy and the destitute Take advantage of tax breaks that are still in effect

By Eva Rosenberg, MarketWatch
LOS ANGELES (MarketWatch) – It’s not news that the supercommittee didn’t commit. We’re sitting here in November, once again, waiting for legislation that will or won’t extend certain tax benefits, like the 2% reduction in Social Security withholding.
What can you do to keep your head above water, keep your taxes as low as possible, and take advantage of tax breaks that are still in effect?
Start out by doing a projection of your adjusted gross income (AGI) and potential standard deductions for 2011. Schedule an appointment with your tax professional to discuss these tips. If you’d prefer to do this yourself. then get a planning tool that is powerful and detailed enough to address things like Alternative Minimum Taxes, passive losses and other limitations, if they affect you.
Many tax pros use the versatile CFS Tax Software products for planning purposes.See the CFS site. If you can’t afford that, or don’t need the complexity, tap into TurboTax’s TaxCaster 2011 free tax calculator (See site here.) or H&R Block’s 2011 tax estimator here.

Tap your bloated retirement accounts

One of the most overlooked tax planning tools is the retirement account. It’s either used indiscriminately — resulting in excessive taxes and penalties — or it’s not used at all, when you could draw the money practically tax-free.
Folks over age 59½: If 2011 takes you to a 10% or 15% tax bracket, perhaps this is a good year to start drawing IRA and retirement money. Don’t spend it if you can afford to retain the money — roll it into a Roth IRA instead.
For instance, Lawrence has been living on Social Security and his pensions for a couple of years, paying no taxes at all. He has such a substantial build-up in his retirement accounts that he could easily draw up to $15,000 without paying more than $500 in Federal or state taxes.
Wally had more than $40,000 of medical expenses for in-home care he paid for himself and his mother for the past five years. No one ever advised him to tap his $500,000 401(k) account during all those years. He could have moved at least $30,000 a year into a Roth IRA without paying a dime in taxes.
Seniors age 70½ and over must draw the required minimum distribution (RMD) from their retirement accounts — or face substantial penalties. These are often the same people who tend to tithe, or be generous to charities. Through the end of 2011, we still have that special qualified charitable distribution allowing you to donate $100,000 in distributions from your IRA directly to charity. You won’t get a charitable contribution deduction. But you won’t pay any taxes. See the IRS publication on special qualified charitable distribution here.

Geithner: Tax reform isn’t enough

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner says the key to U.S. economic growth is to focus on how to make the country a better place to build things.
Let’s not forget you young whippersnappers who built up rich accounts during the height of the market and the heady IPO days. Do you want to retire in your 20s or 30s? But most of your money is in your retirement account? No problem. There’s a special code section that allows you tap into your account right now — without those nasty 10% (plus state) early withdrawal penalties. You are permitted to draw the funds in substantially equal periodic payments over your life expectancy. See related article from the IRS.

Retirement account rape

You are younger than 59½. You aren’t one of the fortunate folks who have managed to build up healthy retirement accounts.  In fact, you’ve been out of work, or faced cutbacks and furlough days. Your income has been so dramatically reduced, you’ve had no choice but to deplete your retirement account.
In addition to being broke and having to pay taxes on that money, you’re also faced with 10% early withdrawal penalties from IRS — plus your state’s penalties. Wouldn’t it be great if Congress could unanimously pass legislation waiving all early withdrawal penalties until this financial crisis is over? Alas, no one is even proposing that considerate provision.

What can you do to avoid the penalties?

As it happens, there are a few provisions in the Tax Code you can use. Not as many as you may need, but you will find a list of exceptions to the penalties in the instructions for line 2 of IRS Form 5329. See IRS instructions for Form 5329 here.
Most of these exceptions only work on withdrawals from IRA accounts, not 401(k)s or other pensions. If you haven’t drawn the money yet — move the money to an IRA before you draw it out. Otherwise, most of these exceptions will not help you.
Exception 3 — You can draw as much money as you need if you are permanently and totally disabled. Hopefully, that’s not your situation. But if it is, get documentation from your physician to back that up.
Exception 5 — Qualified retirement plan distributions up to (1) the amount you paid for unreimbursed medical expenses during the year minus (2) 7.5% of your adjusted gross income for the year. That 7.5% of AGI will take in account your IRA withdrawal. So, your income might still be too high to give you any benefit.
Exception 6 — QDROs. Bad times often result in divorces. Should you be in that position, you can transfer part or all of your pension to your spouse without paying either tax or penalty, using a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) issued by a court. (Note: This only applies to pensions, not IRAs.) Your spouse may roll over all the money to an IRA, also without penalties or taxes. If a spouse needs to live on the money, they have the option to cash out all, or part of the money during that transfer, without penalties.
Exception 7 — This is designed to help people who are unemployed. That applies to nearly 10% of our working population. During the months you are unemployed, the money you’ve drawn to keep paying your health insurance will be penalty-free.
Exception 8 — When you’re not working, or under-employed, it’s a good time to get re-educated into a more marketable skill. Funds used for higher education expenses will also avoid the penalty.
Exception 9 — This is not likely to apply to you when you’re broke. Or it just might, with housing market prices so low, and interest rates the lowest ever. Buying a home might be substantially cheaper than renting in many areas of the country. Draw up to $10,000 as the down payment on a home. You must not have owned a home for more than two years.
Exception 10 — Is for people in trouble. You’re behind on your federal taxes. IRS is after you to pay. The only way you can get this pressure off is to use money from your retirement accounts (IRA or pension). Don’t do it! It’s a trap. Draw that money to pay your taxes and you’re faced with taxes and early withdrawal penalties from IRS, state and your financial institution. If you must use this money, tell IRS to levy your account. At least the IRS and state penalties disappear. IRS staff hate to do this. It requires a mountain of paperwork. But it’s to your advantage to have them do it for you.
Exception 11 — Those noble reservists don’t get their regular income while serving their country. They or their families often find themselves needing funds to cover the shortfall. When on active duty for more than 180 days, draws from any retirement accounts are tax-free.
There are a few other exceptions that might apply to you. Read the rest of the instructions, and get help interpreting them. Wishful thinking often makes the exceptions sound like they apply to you — when they do not.
Eva Rosenberg, EA is the publisher of TaxMama.com , where your tax questions are answered. Eva is the author of several books and ebooks , including Small Business Taxes Made Easy. Eva teaches a tax pro course at IRSExams.com and other tax courses at http://www.cpelink.com/teamtaxmama .